The following compilation was put together by Claire Edwards and is reprinted here with permission. Please share widely.
Note: Director-General of WHO, Ethiopian Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus is the first WHO D-G who is not a medical doctor. He holds an undergraduate degree in biology, a masters degree in immunology of infectious diseases and a PhD in community health.
21.4.20 – Respiratory doctor blows whistle on fake virus pandemic: (Note: video removed from youtube. Below is an excerpt:) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVe3PQ-dHwY&feature=youtu.be
Any incoming patient is labelled a Covid patient. Most patients were never tested but were recorded as Covid deaths no matter what they died of. They’re showing the numbers like a football game to scare yo. I’ve never seen bodies loaded into a tractor trailer. I really don’t believe that they were bodies. All this stuff is fake. There is no shortage of ventilators. This is not invasive ventilation – this CPAP of BiPAP* but we were not allowed to use them – they said it would cause the virus to spread. You have to let the patient crash and go straight to a ventilator. Everything that we would traditionally do, we’re not allowed to do. They’re not testing for a virus. This Covid test is different. They’re testing for an RNA sequence for a reaction to the virus. Then they put it in a PCR, which amplifies it, so if there is one little shred of that RNA sequence from a damaged cell in you lungs or in your nasal passage, you’re going to test positive. That can come from cancer, radiation, from several things. And then you hear all this talk on the news about antibody therapy and people wanting to donate plasma but they’re not talking about the virus itself and that’s a big issue. Is this as infectious as they’re telling us it is? If so, these machines would all be in use and people would be dying and we’re not seeing that. This is unbelievable. Every bit of this has been created. … . I truly believe it is something else causing all this. H1N1 was a million times more scary compared to Covid-19. You cannot vaccinate yourself for a sinus infection. I’m not sure that this is a virus. Does this warrant shutting down the country? For all you Trump supporters out there, we’re doing the same thing they’re doing in France, Italy, the UK so does that mean Trump is really in charge of this whole thing? Because I really don’t think he is. I think he’s being told to do what he’s doing. I think this is Deep State. Illuminati stuff. They’re shutting the world down. The world. And they’re putting our kids and grandkids in severe debt for this scam that will never be paid off. Please ask questions, do your homework. Why are we having auto-manufacturers make ventilators? Who’s testing them? How much are we paying for them. Is this going to be another corporate bailout where they give themselves million-dollar bonuses while we starve?
* The difference between CPAP, BiPAP and ventilators: https://aeroflowinc.com/need-ventilator-instead-bipap-cpap/
26.4.20 – Former neuroradiology chief at Stanford Medical Center gives us the facts and the news is good: https://www.redstate.com/elizabeth-vaughn/2020/04/26/stanford-medical-center-neuroradiology-chief-gives-us-the-stats-tells-americans-to-go-back-to-work/?utm_source=rsmorningbriefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&bcid=61d724a167febce3dc451e400551e837
[Ed. The inclusion of items in this Briefing does not imply endorsement of the stated opinions.]
Dr. Scott Atlas, the former neuroradiology chief at Stanford University Medical Center, wrote an op-ed at The Hill on Friday that every American should read. He lays out five key facts that no one is paying attention to. He calls on policymakers “to ignore the panic and rely on facts. Leaders must examine accumulated data to see what has actually happened, rather than keep emphasizing hypothetical projections; combine that empirical evidence with fundamental principles of biology established for decades; and then thoughtfully restore the country to function.” The bottom line is that the mortality rate for COVID is equivalent to the annual flu.
Atlas makes the case that total isolation no longer makes sense and that it’s time for Americans to go back to work.
The recent Stanford University antibody study concluded the death rate to be between 0.1 to 0.2 percent, in other words, right in line with the seasonal flu.
Initial projected death rates from the World Health Organization “were 20 to 30 times higher.”
Please take a look at the following statistics from New York City:
Under 18 years old: zero and (0 per 100,000 in the population)
18 to 45 years old: 0.01 percent (11 per 100,000 in the population)
75 and over: 0.80 percent (death rate is 80 times that of 18 to 45 years old)
Of all fatal cases in New York State:
Over 70 years of age: 2/3 of all deaths
Over 50 years of age: 95 percent
Underlying illness: 90 percent
Of 6,570 confirmed COVID-19 deaths fully investigated for underlying conditions to date:
6,520, or 99.2 percent, had an underlying illness.
Dr. Atlas concludes that “if you do not already have an underlying chronic condition, your chances of dying are small, regardless of age. And young adults and children in normal health have almost no risk of any serious illness from COVID-19.”
Hospitalizations in New York City as of Friday, April 24: 34,600
Under 18 years old: 0.01 percent
18-44 years old: 0.10 percent
65 to 74 years old: 1.7 percent
Dr. Leora Horwitz of NYU Medical Center concluded: “age is far and away the strongest risk factor for hospitalization.” Dr. Atlas notes that early on, even WHO reported that 80 percent of all cases were mild. It’s been said many times that 50 percent of all cases are asymptomatic. “The vast majority of younger, otherwise healthy people do not need significant medical care if they catch this infection,” Dr. Atlas said.
The quarantines have prevented us from achieving herd immunity. This, Dr. Atlas points out is just “prolonging the problem.” In the last week or so, we’ve seen several studies showing that 30 percent or more of groups tested are found to have developed antibodies.
For most people who test positive for COVID, “medical care is not even necessary. In fact, infected people without severe illness are the immediately available vehicle for establishing widespread immunity. By transmitting the virus to others in the low-risk group who then generate antibodies, they block the network of pathways toward the most vulnerable people, ultimately ending the threat. Extending whole-population isolation would directly prevent that widespread immunity from developing.”
“People are dying because other medical care is not getting done due to hypothetical projections.”
This is something that we’re starting to hear about more and more. Due to COVID, people were asked to postpone elective surgeries and procedures. Not only that, many people have skipped appointments with their cardiologists and other doctors because they are afraid of contracting the virus in a medical facility. The fear factor has resulted in what could have been preventable deaths.
Dr. Atlas writes:
Critical health care for millions of Americans is being ignored and people are dying to accommodate “potential” COVID-19 patients and for fear of spreading the disease. Most states and many hospitals abruptly stopped “nonessential” procedures and surgery. That prevented diagnoses of life-threatening diseases, like cancer screening, biopsies of tumors now undiscovered and potentially deadly brain aneurysms. Treatments, including emergency care, for the most serious illnesses were also missed. Cancer patients deferred chemotherapy. An estimated 80 percent of brain surgery cases were skipped. Acute stroke and heart attack patients missed their only chances for treatment, some dying and many now facing permanent disability.
This is one of the unintended effects of the quarantine and it’s bigger than you might think. I’ll be expanding on this subject in a post later today.
We know that the elderly and those with underlying health issues are the most vulnerable members of the population. And those who fall into this category should absolutely remain in quarantine.
“Knowing that,” says Dr. Atlas, “it is a commonsense, achievable goal to target isolation policy to that group, including strictly monitoring those who interact with them. Nursing home residents, the highest risk, should be the most straightforward to systematically protect from infected people, given that they already live in confined places with highly restricted entry.”
We must “strictly protect the known vulnerable, self-isolate the mildly sick and open most workplaces and small businesses with some prudent large-group precautions. This would allow the essential socializing to generate immunity among those with minimal risk of serious consequence, while saving lives, preventing overcrowding of hospitals and limiting the enormous harms compounded by continued total isolation. Let’s stop underemphasizing empirical evidence while instead doubling down on hypothetical models. Facts matter.”
President Trump was right to call for a quarantine. With the information that was available at the time, he really had no other choice. If he had done nothing, and the coronavirus had turned out to be far more lethal than what had been expected by the experts, or even as lethal as they’d warned, inaction could have been catastrophic.
Knowing what we know now, however, it’s time for us to go back to work. Because America has another problem to deal with – its economy.
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai ~ “Inventor Of Email! World Crisis & Political Power Structure” [Age Of Truth TV]:
(US) Dr.SHIVA LIVE: Time for Truth on Coronavirus: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFczfwW99kU (Note, video removed by youtube)
(US) Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai – Scientist with 4 Degrees from MIT Warns ‘Deep State’ Using Coronavirus Fear-Mongering To Suppress dissent: http://www.tathasta.com/2020/03/scientist-with-4-degrees-from-mit-warns_19.html
NEW – 11.5.20 – Dr Jeffery Barke, MD: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Of6MIiGDyKld/ and
Questioning Conventional Wisdom in the COVID-19 Crisis, with Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of the Hoover Institution: The official virus narrative is false:
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is a professor of medicine at Stanford University. He is a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research and a senior fellow at both the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research and the Stanford Freeman Spogli Institute. His March 24, 2020, article in the Wall Street Journal questions the premise that “coronavirus would kill millions without shelter-in-place orders and quarantines.” In the article he suggests that “there’s little evidence to confirm that premise—and projections of the death toll could plausibly be orders of magnitude too high.” In this edition of Uncommon Knowledge with Peter Robinson we asked Dr. Bhattacharya to defend that statement and describe to us how he arrived at this conclusion. We get into the details of his research, which used data collected from hotspots around the world and his background as a doctor, a medical researcher, and an economist. It’s not popular right now to question conventional wisdom on sheltering in place, but Dr. Bhattacharya makes a strong case for challenging it, based in economics and science.
(US) Dr. Eric Berg Important Lesson From the Spanish Flu Pandemic of 1918:
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi — one of the most cited research scientists in German history — published a video where he reiterates that “Implementation of the current draconian measures that so extremely restrict fundamental rights can only be justified if there is reason to fear that a truly, exceptionally dangerous virus is threatening us. Do any scientifically sound data exist to support his contention for COVID-19? […] The answer is simply: NO!” [emphasis mine]
NEW – Montana physician Dr. Annie Bukacek discusses how COVID 19 death certificates are being manipulated:
NEW: 12.5.20 – Dr. Zach Bush with Del Bigtree:
Excerpts (prepared by a correspondent):
“When you add a money making schema to genetic modification, now you’ve changed nature again. Nature’s whole goal is biodiversity and sustaining life. We have put ourselves against that nature that has proclaimed itself the champion of biodiversity and life on earth, and we are destroying that.”
Dr Bush gives explanations as to why, then just after 38 minutes into the video he said: “We need to treat COVID-19 like a hypoxic injury.”
Regarding stats on 5,000 people who have died in New York on ventilators….
We know this from watching other doctors speak out, but Dr Bush explains it so well that when he said the words “We need to treat COVID-19 like a hypoxic injury,” we realise how so people have died unnecessarily by being put on ventilators. The hypoxia is the primary symptom and any viral/bacterial ones are secondary infections.
“Forced oxygen is very noxious to the lungs. If you push oxygen into the lungs and the bloodstream still can’t bind it, you haven’t fixed the hypoxemic event. And so you’re pushing an oxidative injury, which is an inflammatory, onto a tissue that can’t absorb the oxygen at the tissue level, and so we’ve seen extraordinary levels of death – 88% of people on ventilators are dying. Nowhere else in the world have we seen that level of mortality as it relates to this point. So we’re part of the problem if we keep thinking we have a respiratory failure event with COVID-19. As soon as we come to terms with this as a medical industry, I think we will begin to save lives very rapidly.
“We need to treat COVID-19 like a hypoxic injury similar to cyanide poisoning. We need to change the shape of the hemoglobin, which we can do, and we know how to treat cyanide poisoning. Cyanide poisoning happens to present exactly like COVID syndrome.” Dr Bush explains exactly how this works.
So much more and my notes barely touch on it…how viruses bind to air particle pollution –so much interesting and essential information to know.
We should have stopped influenza vaccination because an extraordinary study came out in 2017 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607599) showing that, if we vaccinate for flu, your risk of getting coronavirus the following year goes up. And this is not just corona, but six other other common respiratory viuruses, the risk goes up. And this is commonly seen. This is a well-described scientific phenomenon, that if you get exposed to the real influenza, you develop what’s called “transverse immunity”, where you get immunity to bugs that aren’t even represented in influenza. You get this immune system intelligence, and you now become resistant to other bugs. If you don’t get flu, and you are exposed to an abnormal protein within that flu virus and so you have to mount a weird antibody to that, so you can’t get your normal, herd-type, immune-system response to the environment, then you get increased risk of this. So what we should have done, if we really believed that this thing was ten times more deadlty than flu (actually they said at the beginning they said it was a hundred times more deadly than flu), if they really believed that, then in December they should have frozen all influenza vaccines …
Since 1986, we have not been testing for efficacy and safety of our vaccines.
Dr Zach Bush also ends with a genuine, deep-shared awareness of the beauty of life and how we are missing that, how we have the potential to evolve past fear and realize love. Our world needs more like him.
Buttar (ranked as one of top 50 doctors in US; best-selling author)
Dr. Rashid Buttar: Virus Engineered – Fake Pandemic: https://phibetaiota.net/2020/03/dr-rashid-buttar-virus-engineered-fake-pandemic/
Renowned Microbiology Specialist On Why He Believes Coronavirus Measures Are “Draconian” (Video): https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/03/30/renowned-microbiology-specialist-on-why-he-believes-coronavirus-measures-are-draconian-video/
16.4.20 – EXCLUSIVE: Dr. Rashid Buttar BLASTS Gates, Fauci, EXPOSES Fake Pandemic Numbers As Economy Collapses: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGbYHJcMbz8 (Note video deleted from youtube)
27.4.20 – LondonReal – Dr. Rashid Buttar – the coronavirus agenda – what the mainstream media don’t want you to know: https://londonreal.tv/digital-freedom-platform-interview-1-dr-rashid-buttar/
17.4.20 – True Earth , Another Truthful Doctor !! WOW ! it’s spreading like a …: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6D853TA_Dls (Note video deleted from youtube)
Why You CANNOT And Will NEVER “Catch” Coronavirus: https://drleonardcoldwell.com/2020/04/01/why-you-cannot-and-will-never-catch-coronavirus-video/
(UK) Dr. Vernon Coleman:
(US?) Dr. Thomas Cowan: CENSORED BY YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=11&v=jh1T4c3wP8I&feature=emb_logo
NOW AT BRIGHTEON: Covid-19/Coronavirus Caused By 5G? Dr Thomas Cowan, MD – Joshua Coleman:
Doctor Thomas Cowan M.D. Claims 5G Radiation Poisoning Could Be Causing Coronavirus:
Dr. Thomas Cowan Covid19 fails Koch’s postulates:
Coronavirus Fear, Germ Theory, Exosomes, and Resiliency – Thomas Cowan, MD, and Sayer Ji:
18.4.20 – Dr Verné Dove BVSc Hons BAnimSc (Research: Veterinary Pathology) MVS (Veterinary Conservation Med.) MVS ( Veterinary Disease Surveillance) Dip. Conservation PhD candidate (Dolphin Health Assessment) Murdoch University, Australia Universidad de los Andes, Colombia 18th April 2020
I’m a Veterinary Surgeon who graduated from Melbourne University with a double degree ( 1st: Veterinary Science, 2nd: pathology/toxicology), I have two Masters degrees one of which is in disease surveillance (epidemiology), and I’ve been doing my PhD on epidemiology and risk assessment. I was also awarded a recent alumni achievement award from Melbourne University.
I’ve been watching this outbreak since it started, and have correctly predicted its course. You are doing a fabulous job at slowing our curve, and I commend you on what you are doing as you have certainly bought us time. I have two urgent matters to bring to your attention. The first is it is unlikely a vaccination will work. Veterinarians are the only ones with a coronavirus vaccine, and what’s been found in vaccinated animals that are subjected to infection with another coronavirus often results in worse pathology and they even have fatal consequences as demonstrated in a few studies. This makes prevention very difficult, and vaccine efficacy will be questionable. This means the focus will need to be on treatment/cure.
The second matter is my current disease hypothesis that may result in successful treatment of critical cases. I have a crazy but very plausible hypothesis, and there’s a toxicologist in the USA that has released a similar hypothesis this week, so that’s at least 2 of us that believe this is plausible. My theory is that SARS-cov2 causes an increase in endogenous (produced in our body) carbon monoxide production in the body, resulting in carbon monoxide poisoning. Carbon monoxide toxicity fits with everything we are seeing. It fits with the high fatalities with comorbidities particularly diabetes, heart disease and obesity.
It fits with cases overseas just dropping dead in the streets, it fits with the ground glass lung pathology seen. It fits with the symptoms, as carbon monoxide poisoning is often misdiagnosed as the flu, causes headaches, dizziness, fatigue, breathlessness. It fits with the lower than expected success with ventilated patients, as carbon monoxide actually increases in ventilated patients. It also explains the neurological signs seen in some patients, and it fits with the success seen with zinc.
This is 100% a hypothesis, but I can’t physically test it. It’s simple though, doctors need to test for Carbon monoxide which is simple to do if they are looking for it. We aren’t looking for it, so no one is testing for it. Up to now doctors have assumed this is a viral induced disease. I believe the virus does not mean to kill us, this is a mistake that has occurred in our bodies in response to the virus, causing a toxicity event. This is why most people are asymptomatic or have mild disease.
So my theory in a nutshell is the virus causes our bodies to produce more carbon monoxide than usual, which inadvertently causes carbon monoxide toxicity. Treatment is relatively simple as its just in addition to what is already happening, with the addition of using a hyperbaric oxygen chamber. How I came up with this hypothesis. I lived in Bogota, Colombia for 3 years and suffered from altitude sickness. To me this sounds like and looks exactly the same as what I suffered. Carbon monoxide poisoning and altitude sickness present very similar.
Humans produce endogenous carbon monoxide, so I started looking for instances where this carbon monoxide production could be exaggerated, and it all started to make sense. In addition in Bogota, the young coped very well, and travellers new to the region suffered greatly the older they were, so the age fits too with what we are seeing in cases.
Whilst I plan to publish this in a formal paper this will take a month or two, and I would like Australia to have access to this knowledge on the off chance I’m right and we can save lives. It’s easy to test for, and if it is carbon monoxide toxicity, it’s easy to treat. Carbon monoxide has been found to Increase in pathological conditions. It’s not that hard a jump to think that somehow the virus induces certain people to get their carbon monoxide production into a slight overdrive. It doesn’t take much to result in carbon monoxide toxicity.
NOTE BOTH VIDEOS REMOVED FROM YOUTUBE
22.4.20 – NEW – Dr. Erickson COVID-19 briefing pt. 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xfLVxx_lBLU&fbclid=IwAR2ysHUBzaW8nCFTl_keORupApo2dEoMqgZw1ujxLfDsTqWARfEMKkqCwLU
22.4.20 – NEW – Dr. Erickson COVID-19 Briefing, Pt. 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zb6j7o1pLBw&fbclid=IwAR2Hr6UPwpy0AP6tlVZwCZlWE7zduZ__K8M22NHwpsVFgq2tMZgsOoSUVC8
Hansen, Dr. Mike
NEW – 5.5.20 – What doctors are learning from autopsy findings of coronavirus (Covid-19) patients:
“There’s never been a disease in the history of mankind that’s presented in so many different ways.” “much stiffer than normal lungs.”
Once the SARS-CoV-2 virus is deeply embedded in the body, it begins to cause more severe disease. This is where the direct attack on other organs that have ACE2 receptors can occur, including heart muscle, kidneys, blood vessels, liver, and the brain. Early findings, including those from multiple autopsy and biopsy reports, show that viral particles can be found not only in the nasal passages and throat, but also in tears, stool, kidneys, liver, pancreas, and heart. One case report found evidence of viral particles in the CSF, meaning the fluid around the brain. That patient had meningitis.
So the virus is sometimes going to all these different organs by means of attaching to the ACE2 receptors that are there, but that’s not even the whole story.
Because in some cases, by the time the body’s immune system figures out the body are being invaded, it’s like unleashing the military to stomp out the virus, and in that process, there’s a ton of collateral damage. This is what we refer to as the cytokine storm. When the virus gets into the alveolar cells, meaning the tiny little air sacs within the lungs, it makes a ton of copies of itself and goes onto invading more cells. The alveoli’s next-door neighbor is guessed who, yeah, the tiniest blood vessels in our body, capillaries. And the lining of those capillaries is called the endothelium, which also has ACE2 receptors. And once the virus invades the capillaries. It means that it serves as the trigger for the onslaught of inflammation AND clotting. And Early autopsy results are also showing widely scattered clots in multiple organs. In one study from the Netherlands, 1/3rd of hospitalized with COVID-19 got clots despite already being on prophylactic doses of blood thinners. So not only are you getting the inflammation with the cytokine storm, but you’re also forming blood clots, that can travel to other parts of the body, and cause major blockages, effectively damaging those organs.
So wait a minute doc, you’re telling me that this can cause organ damage by:
1) Directly attacking organs by their ACE2 receptor? Yup
2) Indirectly attacking organs by way of collateral damage from the cytokine storm? Yup
3) Indirectly cause damage to organs by means of blood clots? Yup
4) Indirectly cause damage as a result of low oxygen levels, improper ventilator settings, drug treatments themselves, and/or all of these things combined? Yeah
Endothelial cells are more vulnerable to dying in people with preexisting endothelial dysfunction, which is more often associated with being a male, being a smoker, having high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity. Blood clots can form and/or travel to other parts of the body. When blood clots travel to the toes, and cause blockages in blood flow there, meaning ischemia or infarction, that can cause gangrene there. And lots of times patients with gangrene require amputation, and “COVID toes”.
So is antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS), the cause of all these blood clots in patients with severe COVID? Maybe. Some patients with APS have what’s called catastrophic APS, where these patients can have strokes, seizures, heart attacks, kidney failure, ARDS, skin changes like the ones I mentioned. Viral infectious diseases, particularly those of the respiratory tract, have been reported as being the triggers for CAPS.
Various factors increase the risk of developing arterial thrombosis. Classically, the cardiovascular-dependent risk factors implicated in clotting have been hypertension, meaning high blood pressure, high levels of cholesterol, smoking, diabetes, age, chemotherapy, and degree of infection. All of these contribute toward developing arterial thrombosis. A lot of patients with severe COVID-19 have certain labs that resemble DIC, such as increased PT/INR, increased PTT, decreased levels of platelets. But the reason why these COVID patients who developed clots in the study I mentioned earlier, the reason why they don’t have DIC, is actually 2 reasons, one, they weren’t having extensive bleeding, and two, they did not have low fibrinogen levels. And if its truly DIC, you would have both of those things.
Anyway, you can probably glean from this video why it’s so hard for doctors to figure out what is going on with this virus. Between the variable ways this disease can present in different patients, and the different ways that organs can suffer damage, yeah, this is really, really really, complicated.
Are BLOOD CLOTS the reason why COVID19 patients are dying? Video Link –
Dr. Mike Hansen, MD Internal Medicine | Pulmonary Disease | Critical Care Medicine Website: https://doctormikehansen.com/
Hay (PhD, not MD)
NEW – 22.4.20- Joel Hay, PhD:
“There is no scientific proof social distancing prevents spread of Covid-19,” says Joel W. Hay, PhD., professor of Pharmaceutical and Health Economics at the USC School of Pharmacy. “Why are we shutting down the schools?” asks Dr. Hay. “Kids aren’t affected by this.”
(US) Prof. Ioannidis from Stanford is featured in a long interview where he reiterates that the data we have is gravely insufficient, and that the interventions that are being taken might be doing more harm than good — we simply don’t know. He is the author of the controversial article “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”.
[Ed. The inclusion of items in this Briefing does not imply endorsement of the stated opinions.]
NEW – 19.4.20 – In this video, a second Stanford University Medical Center doctor, Dr. John Ioannidis, urges America to open up the economy: Dr John Ioannidis announces results of COVID 19 serology study:
Minnesota Senator, Dr. Jensen said that he received a 7-page document from the MN Department of Health advising him to fill out death certificates with a diagnosis of #COVID-19 whether the person actually died from COVID-19 or not. Can we trust the death numbers we’ve been seeing?” https://www.valleynewslive.com/content/misc/Sen-Dr-Jensens-Shocking-Admission-About-Coronavirus-569458361.html
CDC’s guidance for certifying Covid-19 deaths not accurate — no virus testing, only “suspected” cause required: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdcs-guidance-certifying-covid-19-deaths-not-accurate-no-virus-testing-only-suspest
Dr. Scott Jensen explains that the CDC’s present guidelines for determining
“COVID-19 deaths” are not evidence-based, and may even have to do with the greater profitability of doing so. His testimony runs directly counter Dr. Fauci, who labeled any criticism of their highly controversial policy “conspiracy theory.”
NEW – 11.5.20 – Dr Andrew Kaufman: They want to genetically modify us with the Covid-19 vaccine: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/dr-andrew-kaufman-they-want-to-genetically-modify-us-with-the-covid-19-vaccine/
Running Time 55 mins:
Dr Andrew Kaufman exposing the ‘Covid-19’ magic trick – the sleight of hand that transformed societyDr Kaufman M.D. explains how this is all fake:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXargSbVp7E&feature=emb_logo (Video removed)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZzIxnCHVDM (Video removed)
Dr Andrew Kaufman: A Breakdown on Current Testing Procedures:
Jaymie Icke Plandemic Podcast: Interview with a US Doctor: How Can You Make a Vaccine for Something Never Proven to Exist?: https://www.brighteon.com/f3a2113e-13cd-4dde-82fb-f19291dfc3cb
JI: “Do you believe there is a virus in the first place?” Dr. K.: “No, I do not.” … Questions the idea that infections can be passed from person to person because no evidence for this has been provided.
7.4.20 – Medical Doctor Blows CV19 Scamdemic Wide Open – Andrew Kaufman M.D.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lHuL7HOC5MI&feature=emb_logo (Video removed)
Australasian Integrative Medicine Association (AIMA) – Dr. Robin Kelly: Webinar Covid19 5G and existing radio waves:
FRANCE – JE SUIS MEDECIN, PAS FLIC !:
« On nous demande contre quelques euros de vous fliquer » (Karim Khelfaoui, médecin révolté)
55€ pour un patient covid avec les données de sa famille. 2€ en plus pour obtenir les contacts au delà de la cellule familiale et 4€ si les informations permettent de joindre ces contacts supplémentaires. Bienvenue dans le fichage à la tâche qui sera demandé aux médecins après le confinement !
Mais cela n’est que la 1ère étape. Après, place aux brigades sanitaires : des salariés de l’Assurance Maladie qui auront accès à vos données médicales. Bye bye le secret médical ! Ces petits soldats seront chargés de faire la traque aux potentiels malades et d’enquêter en procédant par exemple à des interrogatoires téléphoniques.
3e étape : les Big Data ! Deux fichiers nationaux sont prévus. Le « Sidep » recensera les données biologiques des personnes positives au covid. Tandis que le « contact tracing » listera les personnes ayant côtoyées le malade. Toutes les personnes figurant dans ces fichiers seront « invitées » par les brigades sanitaires à se confiner.
Ces données sont prévues pour être gardées 1 an et seront disponibles à tout un tas de personnes en dehors du médecin. Une aubaine pour les GAFAM qui attendaient impatiemment de parfaire leur business du traçage grâce à la santé ! Ainsi, en France, Microsoft compte bien s’emparer d’une part du gâteau.
La firme propose ainsi son Health Data Hub au gouvernement. Une interface entre producteurs de données : nous, et utilisateurs de données : par exemple des chercheurs. Et demain qui sait… des entreprises privées, des assurances ou des mutuelles ! Une bonne raison de penser qu’après un an, il y aura une suite à ce qui sera sans aucun doute devenu un marché.
Nous voilà bien. Nous sommes la société qui aura inventé des applications de tracing dans la poche, qui aura transformé les médecins et l’assurance maladie en agent de la Stasi mais qui aura envoyé au front des soignants avec des masques périmés et laissé crever ses vieux loin des leurs dans des salles de réanimation ou dans des Ehpad moroses gérés par des fonds de pension cotés en bourse.
Il va falloir reprendre les choses en main et aller les dégagez !
Vidéo : Karim Khelfaoui (médecin généraliste et régulateur au Samu 13)
I’M A DOCTOR, NOT A COP !: https://www.facebook.com/cerveauxnondisponibles/videos/1370715369802794/?q=cerveaux
“We are asked for a few euros to screw you” (Karim Khelfaoui, doctor up in arms)
55€ for a covid patient with family data. 2€ more to get contacts beyond the family unit and 4€ if the information allows to join these additional contacts. Welcome to the registration to the task that will be asked to the doctors after the confinement !
But this is only the 1st stage. Then, place to the health brigades: Health Insurance employees who will have access to your medical data. Bye bye the medical secrecy ! These Small Soldiers will be responsible for tracking down potential patients and investigating, for example, by conducting telephone interviews.
Step 3: Big Data ! Two national files are planned. The “Sidep” will record the biological data of people positive to covid. While the “contact tracing” will list the people who have been with the patient. All persons in these files will be “invited” by the health brigades to confine themselves.
These data are planned to be kept for 1 year and will be available to a whole bunch of people outside the doctor. A boon for GAFAM who were looking forward to perfecting their tracing business thanks to health ! Thus, in France, Microsoft plans to take a share of the cake.
The firm thus offers its Health Data Hub to the government. An interface between data producers: us, and data users: e.g. researchers. And tomorrow who knows … private companies, insurance or mutuals ! A good reason to think that after a year there will be a continuation of what will undoubtedly become a market.
Here we are. We are the company that invented tracing apps in the pocket, that turned doctors and health insurance into a Stasi agent but that sent caregivers to the front with outdated masks and let their old people die away from their own in resuscitation rooms or in gloomy Ehpads managed by publicly traded pension funds.
We’re gonna have to take things back and get them out of the way !
Video: Karim Khelfaoui (general practitioner and regulator at Samu 13)
(INT) Dr. Klinghardt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgj-VT5iVh0&feature=youtu.be
COVID-19 is a condition of oxygen deprivation, not pneumonia… VENTILATORS may be causing the lung damage, not the virus:
COVID-19 is not a pneumonia-like disease at all. It’s an oxygen deprivation condition, and the use of ventilators may be doing more harm than good with some patients. The ventilators themselves, due to the high-pressure methods they are running, may be damaging the lungs and leading to widespread harm of patients. “In these nine days I have seen things I have never seen before,” he says.
17.4.20 – For the medical community!!! Could COVID-19 be causing DIFFUSION hypoxemia??
(UK) Dr. John Lee, retired professor of pathology and a former consultant pathologist for UK’s National Health Service, reiterates in an article that
“Covid-19 deaths are a substantial over-estimate”, and that “the measured increase in numbers of deaths is not necessarily a cause for alarm, unless it demonstrates excess deaths [emphasis mine] – 340 deaths out of 46,000 shows we are not near this at present.”
Coronavirus Patients – This is what I learned during 10 days of treating Covid pneumonia at Bellevue Hospital. … I realized that we are not detecting the deadly pneumonia the virus causes early enough and that we could be doing more to keep patients off ventilators — and alive. … Nick Caputo, an emergency physician in the Bronx. “Rich,” he said, “it’s like nothing I’ve ever seen before.” … During my recent time at Bellevue, though, almost all the E.R. patients had Covid pneumonia. … During my recent time at Bellevue, though, almost all the E.R. patients had Covid pneumonia. … Even patients without respiratory complaints had Covid pneumonia. … And here is what really surprised us: These patients did not report any sensation of breathing problems, even though their chest X-rays showed diffuse pneumonia and their oxygen was below normal. How could this be?
We are just beginning to recognize that Covid pneumonia initially causes a form of oxygen deprivation we call “silent hypoxia” — “silent” because of its insidious, hard-to-detect nature. … Pneumonia is an infection of the lungs in which the air sacs fill with fluid or pus. Normally, patients develop chest discomfort, pain with breathing and other breathing problems. But when Covid pneumonia first strikes, patients don’t feel short of breath, even as their oxygen levels fall. And by the time they do, they have alarmingly low oxygen levels and moderate-to-severe pneumonia (as seen on chest X-rays). Normal oxygen saturation for most persons at sea level is 94 percent to 100 percent; Covid pneumonia patients I saw had oxygen saturations as low as 50 percent. …
Their pneumonia had clearly been going on for days, but by the time they felt they had to go to the hospital, they were often already in critical condition.
In emergency departments we insert breathing tubes in critically ill patients for a variety of reasons. In my 30 years of practice, however, most patients requiring emergency intubation are in shock, have altered mental status or are grunting to breathe. Patients requiring intubation because of acute hypoxia are often unconscious or using every muscle they can to take a breath. They are in extreme duress. Covid pneumonia cases are very different.
A vast majority of Covid pneumonia patients I met had remarkably low oxygen saturations at triage — seemingly incompatible with life — but they were using their cellphones as we put them on monitors. Although breathing fast, they had relatively minimal apparent distress, despite dangerously low oxygen levels and terrible pneumonia on chest X-rays. …
NEW – 13.5.20 – Nobel prize winning scientist Prof Michael Levitt: lockdown is a “huge mistake”: https://www.davidicke.com/article/570222/nobel-prize-winning-scientist-prof-michael-levitt-lockdown-huge-mistake
As he is careful to point out, Professor Michael Levitt is not an epidemiologist. He’s Professor of Structural Biology at the Stanford School of Medicine, and winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for “the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems.” With a purely statistical perspective, he has been playing close attention to the Covid-19 pandemic since January, when most of us were not even aware of it. He first spoke out in early February, when through analysing the numbers of cases and deaths in Hubei province he predicted with remarkable accuracy that the epidemic in that province would top out at around 3,250 deaths.
19.4.20 – ‘No evidence that Covid-19 is causing huge loss of life’: https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/2018743210/no-evidence-that-covid-19-is-causing-huge-loss-of-life
Radio interview (downloadable)
Professor Michael Levitt, a Nobel laureate and Stanford biophysicist, says there is no clear evidence that Covid-19 is causing massive loss of life, despite evidence to the contrary in places like Europe and New York City. In fact, Levitt says it has not been a particularly bad year for flu deaths. And the people who are dying from coronavirus are those who are at risk of death anyway. Professor Levitt believes we’re been ‘primed for Covid-19 panic.’ “What you’re saying here is the case/fatality ratio. It’s the first time that the diagnosis has been by the presence of viral RNA on the person. There’s now lots of evidence that, for every symptomatic case, there might be as many as 10 asymptomatic cases. So I think that using the case/fatality ratio is a very, very dangerous thing. If you look at Germany, for example, they have a much lower ratio.
Certainly my estimates very early on were that, the most well-defined epidemic so far has been in China, excluding Hubei, the province where it all happened. There were about 120 deaths in China from people who had left Hubei. And they were all very heavily controlled. And there the death rate is 0.84%.
But I still think it depends how you define a case. I think there’s evidence now that if you check for coronavirus in places like New York or Germany, 15% of the population have coronavirus. So if you, instead of thinking about cases, think about population fatality rates, they are either five times less than flu or three times higher than flu.
So in some ways we don’t yet know that. No one really knows enough about the virus to know what level of infection you need to have herd immunity. I’ve been looking at this whole question. Let’s imagine we have to let this thing burn itself out, we don’t have a vaccine. How many people would die until we had something like enough herd immunity to protect us? In some ways, Covid is a little bit nicer than influenza. Not as a disease – it’s an awful disease, as is influenza. But influenza tends to kill younger people. I think something like 25% of the influenza deaths are people under 70. Whereas for Covid it looks like only 10% are.
So we don’t know yet. I think the answers will be coming very soon with the antibody testing. It will be very interesting to look back on this six months or a year from now. And we’ll probably say: how can we have been so fooled? Because there’s been a lot of very, very irresponsible reporting. Even in so-called high-quality journals like the New York Times. I saw an article there where they basically said that coronavirus was going to kill as many people as had been killed in Vietnam, the Korean war and something else. And of course, the number might be the same, but a person dying over the age of 80 is not the same as a soldier dying at the age of 20.
Statisticians know this. Economists know this. There’s a very simple measure called “years of life lost”, where basically, if you die after the life expectancy for your country, that doesn’t count. And let’s say your life expectancy is 80 and you die at the age of 75, that costs five years. If you die at the age of 20, it costs 60 years. But it seems to me that, just out of a sense of fairness, we have to rank the unfulfilled life as being worth more than a very full life. Otherwise we will have no progress. The key question is going to be, in the 12 months, say from six weeks from now, let’s say 1 June. If we go back 12 months and ask, what are the total number of deaths in the world in that period? Is it significantly larger than it was in previous years? And I don’t know, but I would not be surprised if the excess was very, very small.
It could be that I’m wrong, but not having immunity to Coronavirus is not a good thing. Let’s just see. It’s been very gratifying, for example… I was actually born in South Africa. And in South Africa there’s actually been a negative death rate from Coronavirus because of all the murders that didn’t happen. Just simply counting deaths is not the way to do this. You need to think about exactly who is dying …”
“So far, we don’t yet know. It’s not clear to me that total lockdown is needed or even desirable. I’m not saying that it’s not desirable. There’s no doubt that if you had total, complete lockdown and nobody was allowed to move, you would get rid of the virus. Maybe health professionals will recommend that. But you’re also doing a huge amount of psychological damage. Children – panic attacks are enormously common now. I have family members who are suffering from this. And then, of course, the economic toll. And again, if your country’s wealth drops by 1%, then the poor people feel 10%. The rich people feel nothing.
“The director of the University Medical Center Hamburg, Dr. Ansgar Lohse, demands a quick end to curfews and contact bans. He argues that more people should be infected with corona. Kitas and schools should be reopened as soon as possible so that children and their parents can become immune through infection with the corona virus. The continuation of the strict measures would lead to an economic crisis, which would also cost lives, [emphasis mine] said the physician.’ (Via SPG)
Surveillance: Dr Mercola – New App Requires Reporting of People Sneezing or Coughing: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/04/01/live-coronavirus-map.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20200401Z1&et_cid=DM495106&et_rid=841780283
6.5.20 – Ventilators may increase risk of death from COVID-19:
In recent weeks, several doctors and published papers have noted that COVID-19 patients who are put on ventilators have an increased risk of death. April 9, 2020, Business Insider reported that 80% of COVID-19 patients in New York City who are placed on ventilators die, causing some doctors to question their use.
According to The Associated Press, “Similar reports have emerged from China and the United Kingdom. One U.K. report put the figure at 66%. A very small study in Wuhan … said 86% died.”
Updated New York City Statistics
An April 22, 2020, study published in JAMA describing the outcomes for 5,700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City area reported:
“Mortality rates for those who received mechanical ventilation in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups were 76.4% and 97.2%, respectively. Mortality rates for those in the 18-to-65 and older-than-65 age groups who did not receive mechanical ventilation were 19.8% and 26.6%, respectively. There were no deaths in the younger-than-18 age group.”
These numbers were amended shortly thereafter, though. April 26, 2020, CNN Health reported that an average of 24.5% of patients placed on ventilators died, compared to about 20% of those who were not ventilated.
Karina Davidson, senior vice president of research at Northwell Health, told CNN her team had decided to “clarify the wording of the report,” and that the figures are being updated to reflect “how many [patients] we know have had an outcome and how many remain in the hospital.” CNN explained:
“The original report in JAMA stated that 12% of patients required ventilation and of them 88% died — but those numbers only represented a minority of patients whose outcome was known, not the entire body of patients. The updated numbers include all of the patients, including those who remained in the hospital at the time the data was gathered on April 4.”
In an April 8, 2020, article, STAT News reported:
“What’s driving this reassessment is a baffling observation about COVID-19: Many patients have blood oxygen levels so low they should be dead. But they’re not gasping for air, their hearts aren’t racing, and their brains show no signs of blinking off from lack of oxygen.
That is making critical care physicians suspect that blood levels of oxygen, which for decades have driven decisions about breathing support for patients with pneumonia and acute respiratory distress, might be misleading them about how to care for those with COVID-19.
In particular, more and more are concerned about the use of intubation and mechanical ventilators. They argue that more patients could receive simpler, noninvasive respiratory support, such as the breathing masks used in sleep apnea, at least to start with and maybe for the duration of the illness.”
Oxygen Is Needed but Ventilation May Be Inadvisable
Dr. Cameron Kyle-Sidell, whose video is featured at the top of this article, has noted their patients’ symptoms have more in common with altitude sickness than pneumonia. Similarly, a recent paper by Drs. Luciano Gattinone and John Marini describes two different types of COVID-19 presentations, which they refer to as Type L and Type H.
While one benefits from mechanical ventilation, the other does not. Dr. Roger Seheult discusses this paper, as well as the comparison of COVID-19 to high altitude pulmonary edema or HAPE, in the MedCram video above.
In the final analysis, it may turn out that ventilators are inappropriate for a majority of patients, and doctors at UChicago Medicine report “truly remarkable” results using high-flow nasal cannulas in lieu of ventilators. As noted in a press release:
“High-flow nasal cannulas, or HFNCs, are non-invasive nasal prongs that sit below the nostrils and blow large volumes of warm, humidified oxygen into the nose and lungs.
A team from UChicago Medicine’s emergency room took 24 COVID-19 patients who were in respiratory distress and gave them HFNCs instead of putting them on ventilators. The patients all fared extremely well, and only one of them required intubation after 10 days …
The HFNCs are often combined with prone positioning, a technique where patients lay on their stomachs to aid breathing. Together, they’ve helped UChicago Medicine doctors avoid dozens of intubations and have decreased the chances of bad outcomes for COVID-19 patients, said Thomas Spiegel, MD, Medical Director of UChicago Medicine’s Emergency Department.
‘The proning and the high-flow nasal cannulas combined have brought patient oxygen levels from around 40% to 80% and 90%, so it’s been fascinating and wonderful to see,’ Spiegel said …
‘Avoiding intubation is key,’ Spiegel said. ‘Most of our colleagues around the city are not doing this, but I sure wish other ERs would take a look at this technique closely.’”
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Technique
Another less available and more complicated treatment strategy that’s showing promise is known as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or ECMO. The system involves a complex circuit of tubes, filters and pumps that oxygenate the patient’s blood and remove waste products outside the body before pumping it back into circulation.
Guidance for the use of ECMO in COVID-19 treatment was published March 30, 2020, in the ASAIO Journal. As a general rule, ECMO is recommended for relatively young patients with few comorbidities who are failing to respond to ventilator treatment. According to an April 24, 2020 press release by the University of Michigan:
“As of April 21 … more than 470 patients with suspected or confirmed cases of COVID-19 have been treated at the ECMO centers that are sharing their data. Most were men in their 40s and early 50s. Nearly half had obesity and one-fifth had diabetes.
Most of those placed on ECMO for COVID-19 are still on the treatment, which can take weeks to allow the body to recover enough for the patient to function on their own. Every moment of that time, patients must be under the care of teams of trained nurses, respiratory therapists, technicians and physicians …
Patients must get evaluated by an ECMO center and transferred before their condition worsens too much. They should not have been on a ventilator more than seven days before starting ECMO, which means that they should be considered for ECMO soon after the decision to intubate them is made.
‘Despite the substantial resources required to care for patients on ECMO, we believe this is an appropriate strategy for selected patients that are otherwise at imminent risk of death,’ says Jonathan Haft, M.D., medical director of U-M’s ECMO program.”
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy
Sadly missing from the conventional conversation is the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) which I believe might be an excellent treatment method. As noted by Dr. Andrew Saul, editor-in-chief of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, in “A Review of Helpful Antiviral Strategies”:
“Making the oxygen available in a way that’s appropriate to the severity of the patient is the answer. We have to remember that our body is singularly good at taking in oxygen or we wouldn’t be here. And our lungs have a huge amount of absorptive space. I mean, that’s what they do. It’s just an extraordinary system that we have.
Oxygen goes in by diffusion. You don’t push it in; the body sucks it in because if you have more oxygen outside than you do inside, it just goes through. All you do is give a lot of absorptive surface. And if you flattened out all the little alveoli in the lungs, you’d have an enormous area …
So, by providing the oxygen and then see if the body will take it up, you’ve made the first step. That can be done preventively by fresh air and exercise and going out and playing …
If somebody needs more oxygen, and you want to give them a little pressure, if that makes the patient better, then you do it. But the idea that you’ve got to ram this oxygen like a supercharger on a Mustang is, I think, a little bit, shall we say, industry friendly …
[The alveoli] are tiny, tiny little sacks. They have some of the thinnest little membranes you’ve ever seen. Look at them under a microscope. They’re very delicate. So, the last thing you want to do is add injury to insult.”
Mechanical ventilation can easily damage the lungs for the fact that it’s pushing air into the lungs with force. During HBOT, on the other hand, you’re simply breathing air or oxygen in a pressurized chamber, which allows your body to absorb a higher percentage of oxygen.
There’s no airflow being forced directly into the lungs. HBOT also improves mitochondrial function, helps with detoxification, inhibits and controls inflammation and optimizes your body’s innate healing capacity. You can learn more about this in “Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as an Adjunct Healing Modality.”
HBOT Trials for COVID-19
We may eventually hear more about this, however, as NYU Langone Health is currently recruiting COVID-19 patients for a study using HBOT. The study was posted April 2, 2020. As detailed on ClinicalTrials.gov:
“This is a single center prospective pilot cohort study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as an emergency investigational device for treating patients with a novel coronavirus, disease, COVID-19 …
The patient will receive 90 minutes of hyperbaric oxygen at 2.0 ATA with or without air breaks per the hyperbaric physician. Upon completion of the treatment the patient will then return to the medical unit and continue all standard of care …
After the intervention portion of this study, a chart review will be performed to compare the outcomes of intervention patients versus patients who received standard of care.”
Chinese doctors also report “promising results” after treating five COVID-19 patients with HBOT. Two were in critical condition and five were severe. As reported by the International Hyperbarics Association:
“Hyperbaric oxygen was added to the current comprehensive treatments being performed at the hospital for COVID-19 affected patients, with a dose of 90-120 minutes at treatment pressures of 1.4 to 1 fi.ATA.
The results were very encouraging as these five patients received significant therapeutic benefits, including rapid relief of symptoms after the first session.
The rationale for adding this procedure is to help combat the progressive hypoxemia (low blood oxygen levels) that COVID-19 can cause. Hyperbaric oxygen has the ability to add a substantial supply of extra oxygen into the bloodstream …”
Hospitals Are Major Transmission Sites of SARS-CoV-2
In this video, taped April 17, 2020, Dr. John Ioannidis discusses results from three preliminary studies. Importantly, he points out that nosocomial infections — infections that occur in hospital settings — appear to be part and parcel of why the COVID-19 mortality rate is so much higher in certain areas, such as Italy, Spain and the New York metropolitan area.
A common denominator between these areas is a massive number of hospital personnel who are infected with SARS-CoV-2 and spread it to patients who are already in an immune-compromised state.
“Hospitals are the worst place to fight the battle with COVID-19,” he says. “We should have done our best to keep people away from the hospitals if they had COVID-19 symptoms, unless they had really severe symptoms.”
In essence, by having so many people unnecessarily going to the hospital out of fear, a hospital-chain of infectious transmission was allowed to develop. Many could simply have been treated at home.
These findings highlight the need for very stringent infection control measures in hospitals, to avoid transmission from asymptomatic personnel to patients. They also highlight the need to more carefully assess your need for medical care.
Ioannidis stresses that people experiencing mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 should not rush to the hospital, as they simply increase the risk of infectious transmission to personnel and other more vulnerable patients.
He also cites data showing hospital personnel have an estimated 0.3% chance of death from COVID-19, which is significantly lower than the 3.5% originally cited by the World Health Organization. He also points out that this and other data point to COVID-19 having a fatality rate very close to that of seasonal influenza.
This, he says, is good news for hospital personnel who have been working under very distressing conditions, many fearing for their lives. As it turns out, such fears appear to be vastly exaggerated and uncalled for.
Sepsis Is a Common Complication in COVID-19
While treating mild to moderate symptoms at home may be advisable, it’s important to stay vigilant to signs of sepsis. If COVID-19 symptoms worsen and signs of sepsis develop — described in “Recognizing the Signs and Symptoms of Sepsis” — immediate medical care is required.
Unless promptly diagnosed and treated, sepsis can rapidly progress to multiple-organ failure and death. Sepsis is responsible for 20% of deaths worldwide each year, and the cytokine storm response associated with sepsis also appears to be a primary way by which COVID-19 claims the lives of those who are immunocompromised and/or elderly.
According to a March 11, 2020, paper in The Lancet, 59% of the 191 Chinese COVID-19 patients in the study developed sepsis, and sepsis was present in 100% of those who died. It was the most commonly observed complication, followed by respiratory failure, ARDS and heart failure.
You can learn more about sepsis and its treatment in “Melatonin for Sepsis,” “Vitamin C Lowers Mortality in Severe Sepsis” and “Vitamin C Works for Sepsis. Will It Work for Coronavirus?”
(France) Dr Montagnier on COVID19 and Oxidative Stress: (short) https://vimeo.com/397261221 (and long/full) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4fC9dBo6uQ&feature=youtu.be
Nobel-prize-winner Dr. Luc Montagnier On Coronavirus:
Dr Montagnier – “Par accident, un chercheur aurait pu faire sortir le Covid-19 de ce labo !” Luc Montagnier, prix Nobel de Médecine en 2008 revient sur les origines du Covid 19 au micro d’André Bercoff sur Sud Radio: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hECevTKmwRk
27.4.20 – Nobel prize-winning scientist who discovered HIV says coronavirus was created in laboratory: https://www.dr-rath-foundation.org/2020/04/nobel-prize-winning-scientist-who-discovered-hiv-says-coronavirus-was-created-in-laboratory/
In a highly significant development, Professor Luc Montagnier, the French scientist who shared the 2008 Nobel Prize in Medicine for discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), has added his voice to those who believe the new coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Interviewed on the CNews channel in France, Montagnier asserted that the virus had been designed by molecular biologists. Stating that it contains genetic elements of HIV, he insisted its characteristics could not have arisen naturally.
Asked by the CNews interviewer what the goal of these molecular biologists was, Montagnier said it wasn’t clear. “My job,” he said, “is to expose the facts.” While stressing that he didn’t know who had done it, or why, Montagnier suggested that possibly the goal had been to make an AIDS vaccine. Labeling the virus as “a professional job…a very meticulous job,” he described its genome as being a “clockwork of sequences.”
“There’s a part which is obviously the classic virus, and there’s another mainly coming from the bat, but that part has added sequences, particularly from HIV – the AIDS virus,” he said.
Growing evidence that the virus was ‘designed’
Montagnier also pointed out that he wasn’t the first scientist to assert that the coronavirus was created in a laboratory. Previously, on 31 January 2020, a research group from India had published a paper suggesting that aspects of the virus bore an “uncanny similarity” to HIV. Taken together, the researchers said their findings suggested the virus had an “unconventional evolution” and that further investigation was warranted. While the researchers subsequently retracted their paper, Montagnier said they had been “forced” to do so.
In February 2020, a separate research paper published by scientists from South China University of Technology suggested the virus “probably” came from a laboratory in Wuhan, the city where it was first identified. Significantly, one of the research facilities cited in this paper, the Wuhan National Biosafety Laboratory, is said to be the only lab in China that is designated for the study of highly dangerous pathogens such as Ebola and SARS. Prior to the opening of this laboratory in 2018, biosafety experts and scientists from the United States had expressed concerns that a virus could escape from it. As with the paper published by the Indian researchers, however, the Chinese scientists’ paper has similarly been withdrawn.
Involvement of the pharma industry
Professor Montagnier has long demonstrated that he is not afraid to challenge the prevailing views of the scientific establishment. Previously, in an interview recorded for the 2009 AIDS documentary ‘House of Numbers’, he had spoken out in favor of nutrition and antioxidants in the fight against HIV/AIDS. As the co-discoverer of HIV and a Nobel prize winner, Montagnier’s statements in this interview gave valuable support to Dr. Rath and other scientists who, for years beforehand, had been warning the world about the pharmaceutical business with the AIDS epidemic.
In a similar way, his assertion today that the coronavirus was designed by molecular biologists raises serious questions about the possible involvement of the pharmaceutical industry. As Montagnier infers, a manmade virus whose genome consists of a “clockwork of sequences” and includes elements of HIV could not have been assembled by amateurs. With estimates of the total global economic cost of the coronavirus varying from $4.1 trillion to $20 trillion or more, the ongoing questions about its origins are unlikely to disappear anytime soon.
Frank Hahnel A real Doctor telling truth about #corona. It’s all Fake: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-1n9FVC6ro&feature=youtu.be (Video removed)
He recommends quinine and zinc preventatively. If you can’t find quinine, he recommends 3-4 ounces Schweppes tonic water, which he says contains quinine. Dose for zinc: 50-100 mg zinc (for short time only). [Warning: Always consult your own physician]
Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences at Washington State University
(US) NEW 22.3.20 – Argument for a 5G – COVID-19 Epidemic Causation Mechanism by Martin Pall, PhD: https://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/5g-covid-19-epidemic/
Prof. Em. Pall offers the theory that the suppression of the immune system by exposure to 5G towers could weaken the body and increase the detrimental effect of CoViD-19.
“The question that is being raised here is not whether 5G is responsible for the virus, but rather whether 5G radiation, acting via VGCC activation may be exacerbating the viral replication or the spread or lethality of the disease. Let’s backtrack and look at the recent history of 5G in Wuhan in order to get some perspective on those questions. An Asia Times article, dated Feb. 12, 2019 (https://www.asiatimes.com/2019/02/article/china-to-launch-first-5g-smart-highway) stated that there were 31 different 5G base stations (that is antennae) in Wuhan at the end of 2018. There were plans developed later such that approximately 10,000 5G antennae would be in place at the end of 2019, with most of those being on 5G LED smart street lamps. The first such smart street lamp was put in place on May 14, 2019 (www.china.org.cn/china/2019-05/14/content_74783676.htm), but large numbers only started being put in place in October, 2019, such that there was a furious pace of such placement in the last 2 ½ months of 2019. These findings show that the rapid pace of the coronavirus epidemic developed at least roughly as the number of 5G antennae became extraordinarily high. So we have this finding that China’s 1st 5G smart city and smart highway is the epicenter of this epidemic and this finding that the epidemic only became rapidly more severe as the numbers of 5G antennae skyrocketed.
… “It is my opinion, therefore, that 5G radiation is greatly stimulating the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and also the major cause of death, pneumonia and therefore, an important public health measure would be to shut down the 5G antennae.”
NEW – 7.5.20 – Renowned forensic doctor destroys media ‘killer virus’ lies: ‘nobody has died of Covid-19 in Hamburg without previous illnesses’:
Prominent forensic medicine professor Klaus Püschel has vast experience in autopsying individuals who have died with the Chinese coronavirus in Hamburg, Germany. During an appearance German television, the professor stunned the audience by claiming that the hysteria over the coronavirus is “completely exaggerated,” as all fatalities he examined had serious previous illnesses which would have soon resulted in death with or without the virus. Püschel stated that there is no “killer virus.”
Since the pandemic began, the head of forensic medicine at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf and his team have been autopsying the people who died in Hamburg in connection with the coronavirus. According to Püschel, all of the deceased had at least one previous illness. “[E]ven if this sounds harsh,” Püschel said, “they would all have died in the course of this year.” About 80 percent of the more than 140 people examined suffered from cardiovascular diseases. The average age of the dead is 80 years.
Püschel slammed German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s irresponsible and alarmist propaganda towards the coronavirus:
“I think it’s really completely inappropriate when a president tells his people that we are at war, or when the German chancellor compares the situation with the last world war.”
“No killer virus”
Healthy people should not be afraid of infection: “The fear that this is a killer virus and that many will die from it is completely exaggerated,” said Püschel. “We have to make it clear that we don’t want to be in a glass case. We can’t protect ourselves from everything. And this virus is a comparatively low risk.” The virus is also by no means a death sentence for the elderly and sick. “Most will survive the disease there,” said Püschel.
“This virus affects our lives in a completely exaggerated way. This is out of proportion to the risk posed by the virus,” says the renowned medical examiner. “I am convinced that corona mortality will not even make itself felt as a peak in annual mortality.” There is no reason for fear of death in connection with the spread of the disease in the Hamburg region.
Püschel advocates opening the daycare centers
Püschel sees no particular dangers for most people with the novel corona virus: “Especially children, adolescents, the working population will normally survive this disease without damage.”
That is why Püschel also pleads for the opening of daycare centers and schools:
“The general experience is that the children do not get particularly sick, the adolescents do not get particularly sick. There is not even any indication that they are special spreaders.” The population had to live with the virus: “We have to make friends with it in a way, deal with it, like with the flu and with other infections.”
The doctor underlined the importance of determining whether patients died of the virus rather than with the virus. Autopsies that were carried out abroad paint a relatively clear picture.
Dr Püschel has addressed the lack of transparency when it comes to including fatalities in the virus toll:
“Insufficient amounts of information about exceptional cases are for example made public. Some patients who passed away may be classified as coronavirus deaths even though they may have, in reality, died from an unrelated illness.
As the doctor explained, many patients that succumbed to the illness were very old, smokers, obese, or had preexisting conditions such as diabetes. Lifestyle, age, and other illnesses are therefore closely associated with higher risks, he concluded. By examining other organs, autopsies can play a key role in gaining a better understanding of the virus’s mechanisms.
Now we’ll speak with someone who caused quite a stir in the media over the last few weeks.
Professor Klaus Püschel is the head of forensic medicine at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE). He and his colleague are autopsying all those who died of COVID-19 in Hamburg.
In his opinion, the fear of the virus is exaggerated. COVID-19 is a comparatively harmless disease.
He’s my guest now in the studio. A very warm welcome to you, Professor Püschel. Just to clarify, you think that Corona is affecting us and society in a completely inappropriate and exaggerated way. Is that right?
I stand by that. To make it clear, I’ll say that I think it’s completely exaggerated, for example when this virus is referred to as a KILLER VIRUS. When people are very afraid of it. I think it’s really completely inappropriate when a president tells his people that we are at war, or when the German chancellor compares the situation with the last world war.
We have a virus here that we already know in principle.
However, this is new version which came to us as a pandemic, so we have to react to it in a very special way.
It’s the fear that always eats souls. The individual — you and I — we don’t have to be particularly afraid. There are many other dangers occurring in life that affect us far more.
Ten days ago in an interview with a major newspaper, you said that you hadn’t had a single case of COVID-19 on your dissection table. Not one had died from the illness COVID-19 alone without another pre-existing condition.
Is that still the case?
—Yes. That remains the case. All [COVID-19] deaths for this region, which have now passed 100, have been autopsied, and each one had serious pre-existing diseases.
They were between 50 and 100 years old. The average age is 80 years old.
This indicates clearly that these are people who aren’t in good general condition. Here I must add that they all had at least one special or rather even several diseases.
Cardiovascular disease, heart attack, enlarged heart, constriction of the coronary arteries, calcification of the arteries, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Also liver disease, cirrhosis, kidney insufficiency, metabolic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, dementia, and in such conditions the immune system is weakened and does not react adequately.
What do you find in the victims of COVID-19 when you open them?
The many pre-existing diseases that I’ve spoken of.
We regularly find respiratory infections and pneumonia, and with the pneumonia come a variety of other complications.
On the one hand the virus-related cellular changes, which are very typical, but also accompanying infections, so-called bacterial super-infections, and nosocomial infections.
What is that?
—These are diseases that you only get when you are in hospital or undergoing medical treatment, due to its not being sterile everywhere.
The hygienic conditions in our country are comparatively good, so it cannot be compared to the situation in other countries. We think that is important in the cases of pneumonia. I always point out that relatively often pulmonary embolisms are due to thrombosis, which is why I always say, please stay active and keep moving.
Please stay active and keep moving. Thank you very much for your assessments and your visit, and your explanation, Professor Püschel from the Forensic Medicine Department at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE).
(France) Professeur Didier Raoult, Directeur de l’Institut Méditerranée Infection et spécialiste des maladies infectieuses: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j37S3fuF3w8
NEW: Interview with Professor Didier Raoult in the Parisien newspaper 22 March 2020: https://thesaker.is/interview-with-professor-didier-raoult-in-the-parisien-newspaper-22-march-2020/
…The problem in this country is that the people that talk are abysmally ignorant. I did a scientific study of Chloroquine and viruses, which was published, thirteen years ago. Since then four other studies by other authors have shown that Coronavirus responds to Chloroquine. None of that is new.
That the group of decision makers do not even know about the latest science takes my breath away. We knew about the potential effect of Chloroquine on cultured viral samples. It was known that it was an effective antiviral.
We decided in our experiments to add a course of treatment of azithromicyne (an antibiotic used against bacterial pneumonia – ed).
When we added azithromycine to hydrochloroquine, in treating patients suffering from Covid-19, the results were spectacular. …
(US) Dr. Sircus:
27.4.20 – 5G didn’t cause the coronavirus pandemic but it probably made it worse: https://drsircus.com/coronavirus/5g-didnt-cause-the-coronavirus-pandemic-but-it-probably-made-it-worse/
There are many frightening aspects to the pandemic but none speaks of more trouble than the synchronic occurrence of a new virus and the rapid installation of 5G. One could even stretch the imagine and see the virus running cover for 5G.
The good news is it looks like the beginning of the end for the global lockdown. Doctors in California and many others are showing its time to dial down the fear and free the population back out into the sunshine to enjoy its anti-pathogenic rays. The data is in — stop the panic and end the total isolation. However, the bad news is that the 5G crisis is just beginning and Bill Gates is lusting for all to have the vaccine that will be developed, to tag us all.
A global study published in Israel by Professor Isaac Ben-Israel, chairman of the Israeli Space Agency and Council on Research and Development, shows that “the spread of the coronavirus declines to almost zero after 70 days—no matter where it strikes, and no matter what measures governments impose to try to thwart it.” …
Dr. Isaac Solaimanzadeh, practitioner of Internal Medicine at the Interfaith Medical Center in Brooklyn, is supporting what Dr. Kyle-Sidell is saying in the video about coronavirus being something more like high altitude high altitude pulmonary edema than a viral driven pneumonia: https://drsircus.com/coronavirus/medical-gas-coronavirus-therapy/
Dr. Stilmann on the connection between 5G and “coronavirus”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vbd0R1-pXxs&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR16eP6NXYZ8ld8sn3SnfuanhVzlwqvbTlYFFu8GqIIwyNZKI3Xkv9aWvAo (Video removed from youtube)
Epidemiologist: Coronavirus could be ‘exterminated’ if lockdowns were lifted: https://www.thecollegefix.com/epidemiologist-coronavirus-could-be-exterminated-if-lockdowns-were-lifted/?fbclid=IwAR1UpPUdi14xHkEZcel6bLJ-71kcL4fVPb9JeJFWQ8xk9298gorpI2DIa1c
“Going outdoors is what stops every respiratory disease”
(Germany) Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/international-news/disease/dr-wolfgang-wodarg-confirms-this-is-an-insane-panic/
Medical testimony by Dr. Wodarg on the “Corona Panic”: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/medical-testimony-by-dr-wodarg-on-the-corona-panic?utm_campaign=Daily%20Newsletter%3A%20Touching%20Base%202%20%28Jj32hS%29&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Daily%20Newsletter&_ke=eyJrbF9lbWFpbCI6ICJzdG9wNWdhcHBlYWxAcHJvdG9ubWFpbC5jb20iLCAia2xfY29tcGFueV9pZCI6ICJLMnZYQXkifQ%3D%3D
Dr. Darrell Wolfe: #236 – CORONAVIRUS PT. 1 – LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE:
Coronavirus And Health Dr Robert O Young:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZswSYwnR724&fbclid=IwAR13Mi5cmJyd-FHRXYagtfhAydZHpj_ki6AktYlMDpuIkLk-kIPm6P7cKpg (Video removed from youtube)